IS THIS THE HOLY SPIRIT OR FAMILIAR SPIRITS AND DIVINERS? : Testing the Spirits in Modern Prophecy and Discernment in the Church
Pst. Sam Kamau - KBN
What is your take about the Akurinos, yesterday at state house Prophecy that "Holy spirit has said president Ruto will have 10 years of reign"? There is a growing trend in the church nowadays of familiar spirits and diviners who frequently use phrases such as "LINE IS CLEAR." The Bible clearly instructs us to test every spirit, whether it is from God, human intention, or falsehood. The question that remains in my mind is: what is the motive behind such a “prophetic line”? When I compare this with biblical prophets like Moses, Elijah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and others, I see men who delivered clear, structured, and divinely aligned messages that reflected God’s broader redemptive plan. Do you agree that what we are witnessing today could reflect familiar spirits or divination—using prophetic platforms for influence, visibility, and authority rather than divine truth? It also raises serious concerns about the righteousness, conduct, and spiritual integrity of those claiming to speak in the name of God. There is also a growing pattern where only designated leaders such as a bishop, reverend, or pastor are able to interpret tongues or spiritual utterances, while the rest of the congregation cannot understand or verify what is being said. Today I will share two scenarios of these spiritual diviners.
Let me explain what really happened. During my theology study, while conducting research, I happened to visit one of these types of churches. During the services, there was constant spiritual activity and what appeared to be “spiritual lines” speaking repeatedly. I wanted to understand how this system operates. In my research and intelligence-finding mission, I approached a bishop who explained that they often train two or three loyal and dependable individuals—especially young men and women—who are sometimes even supported financially to speak in tongues strategically. They use coded expressions such as “sign out,” “line clear,” “station 1, 2, 3,” or “open line, passcode 1 open.” Over time, these individuals master the coded communication. When the bishop wants to address a certain issue, they speak in tongues first as confirmation, and then declare that it is heaven speaking, that an angel has come, and that there is a seal from heaven confirming the message. Even financial giving is presented as “approved in heaven.” This reflects spiritual narcissism rather than true spirituality. True prophecy is meant to edify, comfort, and strengthen the Church—not to create systems of control, authority structures, or manipulation.
The second scenario occurred during my spiritual mapping as I prepared to start a church. I visited several churches in Nakuru. In one particular church, after prayers, worship, and individual prayer moments, there was a silent session where the prophetess would address the congregation. Women were lying on the floor crying and shouting, saying, “You have sinned and must repent, Kenya has sinned and must repent, and there is bloodshed coming.” Interestingly, I visited the same church again after three weeks, and the same prophetic message was repeated almost word for word, with identical tone and declarations. This raises an important question: why is the message unchanged and repetitive? Does it imply that God’s voice is limited or static compared to the days of Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, when God communicated diverse, progressive, and detailed revelations covering judgment, restoration, instruction, hope, and direction for His people? This brings a deeper concern about whether some modern prophetic expressions reflect the fullness of God’s voice or a repetitive pattern shaped more by human systems than divine revelation.
The principle of Scripture remains clear: every spiritual utterance must be tested, weighed, and aligned with the character and truth of God. Biblical prophecy was never intended to produce fear, repetition, or dependency on a single voice, but to bring clarity, direction, repentance, and transformation. When prophetic expression becomes predictable, emotionally driven, or centered on alarming declarations without depth, teaching, or instruction, it raises legitimate questions about its source and purpose. The danger is not spiritual expression itself, but when expression replaces discernment and emotion replaces truth. In such environments, believers may become spiritually active but lack understanding—engaged but not grounded.
This is why discernment is no longer optional in today’s Church—it is essential. Every believer must learn to test every message, weigh every prophecy, and measure every spiritual claim against the full counsel of Scripture. The Church must return to a place where prophecy is not used for influence, attention, or validation, but for edification, correction, and alignment with God’s will. True spiritual authority is not proven by emotional impact or public platforms, but by consistency with Scripture, humility in character, and fruit in transformation. Without this, the Church risks drifting into confusion—where voices are many, but truth becomes rare.
The present Church must return to tested truth, where every spirit is weighed by Scripture, not emotion or influence.
The present Church with current truth, understanding the present Church through the lens of God’s truth.
Comments
Post a Comment